> > > Joeri Vankeirsbilck wrote: > >The new automation brings > >Logic a big step closer to Protools, but there's still a way to >go: I > >personally want to see sample accurate waveform zoom in the >arrangment. > >I want to see timestretching of audio in the arrangment the same >way > >Protools does it. Groups have to be added for mixing (Logic >Control has > >a button named "groups", so it looks like that one is on its way) >etc. > > This is exactly what we need!! So how about being our "lobbyist" to Emagic? Represent our "special interest" group. > What do you think I'm doing half of the time? :-))) Of course I'm lobbying for features I want. I'm also lobbying for good features that I picked up on the LUG etc. And I'm not alone. Cheers, Joeri -- Joeri Vankeirsbilck joeri@... Belway Productions - http://www.belway.com List-admin Logic-users/SoundD*ver-users/Logic-TDM
Message
Re: [L-OT] Why Logic over digital performer or ProTools?
2002-03-08 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.