Smeet wrote: >> Nice idea but somehow I think this is an illusion you are chasing. Nothing >> stands still -- OS patches, hardware drivers, Logic updates, new system >> problems crop up. > >As I said, I would learn that eventually. I just don't want lots of downtime >initially. LOL -- very understandable :-) >> Building it yourself in the first place means you know what >> is in there and everything that was done to it from scratch. > >Yes, I think you are right. This is just where my own unpleasant experience of depending on others to fix my computer led me. I learnt the hard way. >> reinstall anything there will be no mystery -- you've already done it. All >> that knowledge is power -- without it you are impotent in the face of >> gremlins that bedevil every computer system from time to time. If you >> don't want to face this reality using a computer as a DAW is a bad idea. > >That sounds a teensy bit condescending, but point taken. Hey -- if you work for a living with all the platforms you listed in your post nobody is condescending to you about computers -- least of all me. Perhaps that would have sounded better if I had written -- "If one does not ..." -- but it sounds a bit too much like something Hugh Grant would say to Kate Winslet in some 19th Century bodice ripper. >> If you don't want to get your hands under the hood, any clone >> dealer can put a box together in an afternoon -- just pick a configuration >> that others are reporting success with on the LUG and replicate it. > >Another good point... The general consensus seems to be to put it >together myself. I guess it's time to start checking out prices... The USA market for hardware looks like heaven from an Australian vantage point -- very cheap and anything you conceivably want delivered to your door overnight. Good luck with your new machine -- I will need to do likewise soon enough. Regards, Murray
Message
Re: [L-OT] [OT] Daw maker recommedations?
2002-05-07 by Murray McDowall
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.