----- Original Message ----- From: "Joeri Vankeirsbilck" <joeri@...> To: <logic-ot@egroups.com> > > Of them all, this LUG is by far the most > > intolerant and has by far the most unacceptable noise to signal ratio. > > It's also the biggest list, I think. 4400+ members is a lot. It does not matter how many the members, intolerance is intolerance. > Not correct: we have lots of new subscribers and therefore some threads are > often restarted by newbies So ... they need somewhere to go to get immediate answers. The problem is also that ignorant people often think that they are being very clever indeed when all they are doing is rehashing arguments that others have heard many times before. As with the making of music itself, it is actually very difficult to be original; but only those who actually make the effort to write songs see how hard it can actually be. Once people have somewhere to go to have these ridiculous kinds of questions answered they will learn two things: (a) that people on the List have heard it all before; and (b) that they are not quite so clever as they think they are. When they come back to the group from having read what is there in all of that, they will immediately know, before they ask another question, that they might well be about to ask ANOTHER question that has been heard many times before. There is little more irritating than a questioner who thinks he is being very clever when rehashing an old issue -- except perhaps an answerer who thinks he is being even more clever when giving a really rather stupid response. In my humble opinion most people on the LUG are actually quite patient and caring people. It is just that some things come up so often and time and time again that people have a kind of a right to be impatient and intolerant of it -- which sets a precedent in that establishes an overall culture in which impatience and intolerance over many other issues is also tolerated when it absolutely should not be. It is very difficult to put a stop to the latter kinds of impatiences when people feel -- rightly-- justified about the former kind. > I intended to make such a page after the recent threads. Seems like the only > possibility. It'll be online by tonight. Hooray hooray hooray hooray. Thank you, thank you, thank you. Even without having seen it -- thank you. It is a HUGE step in the right direction. Please be sure to email Mr. Beyer and tell him when it is up.
Message
Re: [L-OT] Moderation on the LUG
2000-12-17 by KA B
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.