Yahoo Groups archive

The Logic Off Topic list

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Message

Re: Digest Number 20

1999-11-21 by BRADFORD JENKINS

Does anyone know how I can group my faders?  I'm
trying to adjust 12 instrument tracks with one fader
movement.  Is this possible in LAP 4.04 (PC)?

--- logic-ot@onelist.com wrote:
> 
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor
> ----------------------------
> 
>     GRAB THE GATOR! FREE SOFTWARE DOES ALL THE
> TYPING FOR YOU!
> Tired of filling out forms and remembering
> passwords? Gator fills in
> forms and passwords with just one click! Comes with
> $50 in free coupons!
>   <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/gator4
> ">Click Here</a>
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> There are 4 messages in this issue.
> 
> Topics in today's digest:
> 
>       1. Re: Digest Number 19
>            From: BRADFORD JENKINS
> <jenkinsbrad@...>
>       2. OT: Excuse for a Drink!!
>            From: "Arvid Solvang" <arvid@...>
>       3. Re: A theoretical question
>            From: "Pamela or/and Lars"
> <pollen@...>
>       4. Re: A theoretical question
>            From: "Pamela or/and Lars"
> <pollen@...>
> 
> 
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 1
>    Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 07:08:45 -0800 (PST)
>    From: BRADFORD JENKINS <jenkinsbrad@...>
> Subject: Re: Digest Number 19
> 
> There won't necessarily be degradation based on the
> sample rate, but you may have phase cancellations
> that
> may cause the mixed files to sound lifeless.
> 
> Try starting off with high quality stereo files,
> convert sample rate to 48k/32bit (you may need a
> prgm
> like cooledit pro), merge the two files, then
> convert
> sample rate to 44k/16bit.  I've found that the
> texture
> of the material sound much smoother when it's
> upsampled then returned to CD quality rate.  It's
> also
> preferred to be at the highest sample rate possible
> when editing audio files.  (the price you pay: more
> hard drive space is used while at the higher sample
> rates & it may take more time to edit).
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> --- logic-ot@onelist.com wrote:
> > 
> > --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor
> > ----------------------------
> > 
> >     GRAB THE GATOR! FREE SOFTWARE DOES ALL THE
> > TYPING FOR YOU!
> > Tired of filling out forms and remembering
> > passwords? Gator fills in
> > forms and passwords with just one click! Comes
> with
> > $50 in free coupons!
> >   <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/gator4
> > ">Click Here</a>
> > 
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > There are 3 messages in this issue.
> > 
> > Topics in today's digest:
> > 
> >       1. A theoretical question
> >            From: "Arvid Solvang"
> <arvid@...>
> >       2. Re: A theoretical question
> >            From: Bobo Mark <mark4@...>
> >       3. Re: A theoretical question
> >            From: "Arvid Solvang"
> <arvid@...>
> > 
> > 
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> > 
> > Message: 1
> >    Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 19:02:04 +0100
> >    From: "Arvid Solvang" <arvid@...>
> > Subject: A theoretical question
> > 
> > A theoretical question here:
> > 
> > If you have two stereo audio-files, both 16 bit -
> > 44,1khz, and digitally mix
> > them together you still only get a stereo
> audiofile
> > 16 bit - 44,1khz.
> > 
> > Is there then a theoretical degration of the sound
> > quality?
> > 
> > --
> > Arvid Solvang
> > http://www.viagram.no/privat/arvid/
> > ICQ: 13008461
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> > 
> > Message: 2
> >    Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 14:04:33 +0000
> >    From: Bobo Mark <mark4@...>
> > Subject: Re: A theoretical question
> > 
> > Arvid Solvang wrote:
> > > 
> > > From: "Arvid Solvang" <arvid@...>
> > > 
> > > A theoretical question here:
> > > 
> > > If you have two stereo audio-files, both 16 bit
> -
> > 44,1khz, and digitally mix
> > > them together you still only get a stereo
> > audiofile 16 bit - 44,1khz.
> > > 
> > > Is there then a theoretical degration of the
> sound
> > quality?
> > > 
> > 
> > If u don't any processing like EQ,compression.  It
> > should no degration.
> > -- 
> > Regards
> > Bobo mark
> > 
> > -----------------
> > Producer/Engineer
> > Artechnica Sound
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> > 
> > Message: 3
> >    Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 12:50:33 +0100
> >    From: "Arvid Solvang" <arvid@...>
> > Subject: Re: A theoretical question
> > 
> > >>Arvid Solvang wrote:
> > >>
> > >> If you have two stereo audio-files, both 16 bit
> -
> > 44,1khz, and digitally
> > >>mix them together you still only get a stereo
> > audiofile 16 bit - 44,1khz.
> > >>
> > >> Is there then a theoretical degration of the
> > sound quality?
> > >
> > >From: Bobo Mark <mark4@...>
> > >If u don't any processing like EQ,compression. 
> It
> > should no degration.
> > 
> > But wouldn't one track that has all these bits
> have
> > higher resolution than
> > two tracks having the same amount of bits?
> > 
> > PS. I know that there are no audible differents
> I'm
> > just not sure how this
> > work theoreticly.
> > 
> > --
> > Arvid Solvang
> 
=== message truncated ===


=====
BRAD JENKINS

LEAD, FOLLOW, OR SHUT THE HELL UP!!!

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.