Yahoo Groups archive

The Logic Off Topic list

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Thread

Re: Digest Number 20

Re: Digest Number 20

1999-11-21 by BRADFORD JENKINS

Does anyone know how I can group my faders?  I'm
trying to adjust 12 instrument tracks with one fader
movement.  Is this possible in LAP 4.04 (PC)?

--- logic-ot@onelist.com wrote:
> 
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor
> ----------------------------
> 
>     GRAB THE GATOR! FREE SOFTWARE DOES ALL THE
> TYPING FOR YOU!
> Tired of filling out forms and remembering
> passwords? Gator fills in
> forms and passwords with just one click! Comes with
> $50 in free coupons!
>   <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/gator4
> ">Click Here</a>
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> There are 4 messages in this issue.
> 
> Topics in today's digest:
> 
>       1. Re: Digest Number 19
>            From: BRADFORD JENKINS
> <jenkinsbrad@...>
>       2. OT: Excuse for a Drink!!
>            From: "Arvid Solvang" <arvid@...>
>       3. Re: A theoretical question
>            From: "Pamela or/and Lars"
> <pollen@...>
>       4. Re: A theoretical question
>            From: "Pamela or/and Lars"
> <pollen@...>
> 
> 
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 1
>    Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 07:08:45 -0800 (PST)
>    From: BRADFORD JENKINS <jenkinsbrad@...>
> Subject: Re: Digest Number 19
> 
> There won't necessarily be degradation based on the
> sample rate, but you may have phase cancellations
> that
> may cause the mixed files to sound lifeless.
> 
> Try starting off with high quality stereo files,
> convert sample rate to 48k/32bit (you may need a
> prgm
> like cooledit pro), merge the two files, then
> convert
> sample rate to 44k/16bit.  I've found that the
> texture
> of the material sound much smoother when it's
> upsampled then returned to CD quality rate.  It's
> also
> preferred to be at the highest sample rate possible
> when editing audio files.  (the price you pay: more
> hard drive space is used while at the higher sample
> rates & it may take more time to edit).
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> --- logic-ot@onelist.com wrote:
> > 
> > --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor
> > ----------------------------
> > 
> >     GRAB THE GATOR! FREE SOFTWARE DOES ALL THE
> > TYPING FOR YOU!
> > Tired of filling out forms and remembering
> > passwords? Gator fills in
> > forms and passwords with just one click! Comes
> with
> > $50 in free coupons!
> >   <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/gator4
> > ">Click Here</a>
> > 
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > There are 3 messages in this issue.
> > 
> > Topics in today's digest:
> > 
> >       1. A theoretical question
> >            From: "Arvid Solvang"
> <arvid@...>
> >       2. Re: A theoretical question
> >            From: Bobo Mark <mark4@...>
> >       3. Re: A theoretical question
> >            From: "Arvid Solvang"
> <arvid@...>
> > 
> > 
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> > 
> > Message: 1
> >    Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 19:02:04 +0100
> >    From: "Arvid Solvang" <arvid@...>
> > Subject: A theoretical question
> > 
> > A theoretical question here:
> > 
> > If you have two stereo audio-files, both 16 bit -
> > 44,1khz, and digitally mix
> > them together you still only get a stereo
> audiofile
> > 16 bit - 44,1khz.
> > 
> > Is there then a theoretical degration of the sound
> > quality?
> > 
> > --
> > Arvid Solvang
> > http://www.viagram.no/privat/arvid/
> > ICQ: 13008461
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> > 
> > Message: 2
> >    Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 14:04:33 +0000
> >    From: Bobo Mark <mark4@...>
> > Subject: Re: A theoretical question
> > 
> > Arvid Solvang wrote:
> > > 
> > > From: "Arvid Solvang" <arvid@...>
> > > 
> > > A theoretical question here:
> > > 
> > > If you have two stereo audio-files, both 16 bit
> -
> > 44,1khz, and digitally mix
> > > them together you still only get a stereo
> > audiofile 16 bit - 44,1khz.
> > > 
> > > Is there then a theoretical degration of the
> sound
> > quality?
> > > 
> > 
> > If u don't any processing like EQ,compression.  It
> > should no degration.
> > -- 
> > Regards
> > Bobo mark
> > 
> > -----------------
> > Producer/Engineer
> > Artechnica Sound
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> > 
> > Message: 3
> >    Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 12:50:33 +0100
> >    From: "Arvid Solvang" <arvid@...>
> > Subject: Re: A theoretical question
> > 
> > >>Arvid Solvang wrote:
> > >>
> > >> If you have two stereo audio-files, both 16 bit
> -
> > 44,1khz, and digitally
> > >>mix them together you still only get a stereo
> > audiofile 16 bit - 44,1khz.
> > >>
> > >> Is there then a theoretical degration of the
> > sound quality?
> > >
> > >From: Bobo Mark <mark4@...>
> > >If u don't any processing like EQ,compression. 
> It
> > should no degration.
> > 
> > But wouldn't one track that has all these bits
> have
> > higher resolution than
> > two tracks having the same amount of bits?
> > 
> > PS. I know that there are no audible differents
> I'm
> > just not sure how this
> > work theoreticly.
> > 
> > --
> > Arvid Solvang
> 
=== message truncated ===


=====
BRAD JENKINS

LEAD, FOLLOW, OR SHUT THE HELL UP!!!

Re: Digest Number 20

1999-11-21 by Rind

>Does anyone know how I can group my faders?  I'm
>trying to adjust 12 instrument tracks with one fader
>movement.  Is this possible in LAP 4.04 (PC)?
>
just select the objects in the environment (shift-click/rubberband) and 
move away
-bernd

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.