The Logic Off Topic list

>> My point is: keep OT stuff where it belongs.
>Yes ..... but the big problem is setting up criteria for what is OT. You
>want to moderate this? Don't think Joeri wants to do this. Do you Joeri?


Looks like Joeri does, and I think it's a great idea...

>Because of several threads that we all had to deal with on the LUG, I've
>decided to make the list policy more strict and to apply the rules more
>strictly. I'll use the moderation tools strictly from now on to push
>this list in a positive direction. Name-calling, "political" threads and
>many other problematic topics will be moderated immediately. If an
>individual has to go to maintain "peace" on this list, I will have no
>problems in banning him. There are 4400+ subscribers on this list and it
>seems to be the only way to make it work.
>
>I also kindly ask everyone to post less OT mails. There's been quite a
>high "noise ratio" lately. I hope we can all get back on topic and help
>eachother out on Logic-related subjects. This list is made BY Logic
>users FOR Logic-users, so it'll only be as good as we make it!!!
>
>Any comments on this should be sent to me privately, please do not
>bother the list with it. You can mail me at joeri@...     I'll do
>my best to reply to each mail I get, although it might take some time.
>
>Bye,
>Joeri
>--
>Joeri Vankeirsbilck
>joeri@...

I support this 100% - the only way the list will stay on topic is if the
admin tells people to stop OT threads, then moderates anyone who continues
these threads after being warned.

Mike


_________
Mike Connelly, Composer/Sound Designer
mpc@...  /  http://www.noisefloor.com