The Logic Off Topic list

Hi Dave! 
   As someone who's moved from logic to SX, were there any immediate 
weak points that jumped out at you that might affect others 
crossgrading to SX?

I figure that if I do eventually move my copy of logic to a mac next 
year, I'll still want some sort of PC workstation program to run in 
parallel via mLAN to run on my existing fast PC(s) to take load off 
the mac, and since emagic no longer sell Winlogic, this would 
presumably have to be the Steinberg product.

OTOH, if I /do/ keep the thing running under Windows, I'll probably 
want to commit to a platform that the software house consider to be 
current, which again sounds like getting Steinberg SX and keeping 
logic on another PC (or my laptop) just to run the emagic 
softinstruments.

So either way, migrate-to-mac or not, comparative info on SX would be 
appreciated.


--- In logic-ot@y..., "daveporter32043" <porterpe@m...> wrote:
> I am one of the MANY, MANY PC Logic users who have switched 
> to Cubase SX. Cubase SX is a very capable DAW program. Once 
> I took the time to really get to know Cubase SX, I began to 
> really like it. Now, even if EmApple announced that they 
> were going to support the PC after-all, I would never switch 
> back.