>from Jeremy. >> >As I mentioned before, no one had unsubscribed for weeks before that. >> >I seriously doubt it was just a coincidence that 3 people >> >unsubscribed on the second or third day of the huge political >> >thread... though yes, of course we don't know why they left with 100% >> >certainty. I could look up their email addresses if you if you felt >> >like asking them? >> > >Dennis Gunn replied: >> Watch how many leave when they know that censorship will be the policy. > >God! you make such a drama, Dennis. I am constantly amazed at how people make so much of undramatic statements. I made a straight one line observation that did not contain a single adjective and that is called dramatic. >Jeremy has already said that in the >proposed new system, on a day to day basis the L-OT list will not be >moderated. Only occasional threads being moved to a L-WOT list. I get >the distinct impression that you are twisting and exaggerating to support >your argument. Censorship is a very strong word and completely unjustified >in this case, as the posts would still be available, just elsewhere. > >Hector. Jeremy has been censoring people's posts and I am not just talking about mine. And he has said he is proud to be a censor. More than one person on this list has told me personally that they probably won't be hanging around if that is the policy and I am not too sure I will either. What exactly am I twisting or exaggerating. As far as I know I am simply stating the facts in front of me. It strikes me that we are entering the golden age of denial.
Message
Re: [L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by Dennis Gunn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.