> From: Hendrik Jan Veenstra <h@...> > > I think you missed the point of mercutio's post. The fact that the > > last poll only attracted so very few voters and the fact that only 3 > > people unsubscribed (for undetermined reasons) indicates that most > > L-OT'ers don't give a rat's *ss about political threads or not -- > > otherwise they would have voted. > > From: "Hector" <hector@...> > I suspect that most people, being fairly busy, quickly scan throught posts > looking for stuff of interest and delete the rest in bulk. A poll on list > policy is not of immediate interest and gets ignored. These same people, > being musicians on a music list, are probably looking for musically related > posts. They would also quite possibly appreciate a better signal to noise > ratio of musical/non-musical posts, even on a 'OT' list. I find it hard to > imagine people wanting more WOT postings. I can only speak for myself, but I have signed up and signed off both the LUG and L-OT several times over the years. It is for no special reason other than that sometimes I get bored of all the emails or it is of no use for me. In fact (I know this is a very selfish approach, but please forgive me) I filter all messages from both LUG or L-OT to go straight into the trashcan unless I have something I need help with. I've been using Logic since 2.5 and there is really not much I need help with though... That said LUG has been of great value of resource for me over the years. My point is, if I had signed off LUG or L-OT it wouldn't have had anything to with the threads other than that I was bored with all the emails, topics being Logic or not...
Message
Re: [L-OT] a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-24 by ObliviƤn | Bacteria AS
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.