Yahoo Groups archive

The Logic Off Topic list

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Message

Re: [L-OT] Re: 7200 rpm Laptop drives from IBM in Q1 next year

2002-11-08 by Murray McDowall

At 01:36 PM 11/8/02 +0000, you wrote:
>Speaking of hard drives, what do you think of the new WD2000JB from 
>Western Digital? It doesn't use fluid bearings yet but it's still as 
>quiet as a DeskStar and the "BB" model (that has a smaller cache) 
>will eventually use fluid bearings for improved acoustics though I'm 
>not sure if that's really worth reducing the 8 mb buffer. Anyway the 
>controversial thing about this new great drive is that while it's an 
>awesome performer (56 mbytes/s sustained transfer rate!) its average 
>seek time is a little high around 14 ms compared to some of the 
>competition, though none of the faster-seek-time drives come close to 
>its other synthetic and real world benchmark scores. Think that would 
>be ok for audio with regular defragmenting etc? 

I guess so -- even 12 gig 5400 rpm drives I bought 4 years ago were pretty
capable when it came to playing back plenty of 24bit /44.1 kHz  audio
tracks. As far as audio  goes, a low seek time is pretty important for
things like streaming samples for the EXS24/Gigasampler . The highest
performance (max simultaneous voices without glitches) for Gigasampler is
obtained with 10k -- 15k SCSI drives. 

If you think how long your OS takes to load -- most of the time that the
hard-drive light is on must be drive seeks because the total MB of all
loaded files is less than a second worth of continuous read off the media. 

We might see 10,000 rpm IDE before long. I suspect that the IT slump has
delayed their release. Seagate's Barracuda ATA products are pretty similar
to the SCSI equivalent so a "Cheetah ATA" is a possibility although the
Seagate suits may worry that this sort of product would hurt their
profitable enterprise SCSI sales. The top end of SCSI has been 15,000 rpm
for a coulple of years already. 

Regards,
Murray

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.