At 01:36 PM 11/8/02 +0000, you wrote: >Speaking of hard drives, what do you think of the new WD2000JB from >Western Digital? It doesn't use fluid bearings yet but it's still as >quiet as a DeskStar and the "BB" model (that has a smaller cache) >will eventually use fluid bearings for improved acoustics though I'm >not sure if that's really worth reducing the 8 mb buffer. Anyway the >controversial thing about this new great drive is that while it's an >awesome performer (56 mbytes/s sustained transfer rate!) its average >seek time is a little high around 14 ms compared to some of the >competition, though none of the faster-seek-time drives come close to >its other synthetic and real world benchmark scores. Think that would >be ok for audio with regular defragmenting etc? I guess so -- even 12 gig 5400 rpm drives I bought 4 years ago were pretty capable when it came to playing back plenty of 24bit /44.1 kHz audio tracks. As far as audio goes, a low seek time is pretty important for things like streaming samples for the EXS24/Gigasampler . The highest performance (max simultaneous voices without glitches) for Gigasampler is obtained with 10k -- 15k SCSI drives. If you think how long your OS takes to load -- most of the time that the hard-drive light is on must be drive seeks because the total MB of all loaded files is less than a second worth of continuous read off the media. We might see 10,000 rpm IDE before long. I suspect that the IT slump has delayed their release. Seagate's Barracuda ATA products are pretty similar to the SCSI equivalent so a "Cheetah ATA" is a possibility although the Seagate suits may worry that this sort of product would hurt their profitable enterprise SCSI sales. The top end of SCSI has been 15,000 rpm for a coulple of years already. Regards, Murray
Message
Re: [L-OT] Re: 7200 rpm Laptop drives from IBM in Q1 next year
2002-11-08 by Murray McDowall
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.