On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 08:36 AM, Jeremy Martin wrote: > Speaking of hard drives, what do you think of the new WD2000JB from > Western Digital? It doesn't use fluid bearings yet but it's still as > quiet as a DeskStar and the "BB" model (that has a smaller cache) > will eventually use fluid bearings for improved acoustics though I'm > not sure if that's really worth reducing the 8 mb buffer. Anyway the > controversial thing about this new great drive is that while it's an > awesome performer (56 mbytes/s sustained transfer rate!) its average > seek time is a little high around 14 ms compared to some of the > competition, though none of the faster-seek-time drives come close to > its other synthetic and real world benchmark scores. Think that would > be ok for audio with regular defragmenting etc? I have to say that I have had a WD drive fail on me after 6 months (shipped oem in my first g4) - so I am leery of this company. Take that with the usual grain of salt. The spec sounds good - if you are playing/recording long audio files - if you are playing stuff that is edited - or lots of regions etc etc - i.e. more numerous smaller files - then I guess the seek time starts to become a factor. Quiet is good but not essential. Realistically isolation is the only solution to noise problems for drive/fan noise - especially if they leak into your recording environment. So you can get away with noisier equipment if properly isolated from you and your mics.
Message
Re: [L-OT] Re: 7200 rpm Laptop drives from IBM in Q1 next year
2002-11-08 by mercutio
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.