At 02:38 AM 3/23/03 -0500, you wrote: >Does anyone use the ES1 or ES2 much? I have a Nova and Virus B and wondering >if I could replace those with the ES2. The actual synths sound better but >that in part is addition of affects. I am not really very impressed with the >presets in the ES2 (in demo mode). I don't have a Virus to compare with but I think the ES2 is right up there in the world of softsynths. For me the convenience of being able to call up a dozen instances instantly when you reopen a song and have them all cooking away is compelling. >Also I don't understand how and why the >round part rotates. There are two filters which can operate in serial or parallel -- that is what the rotation indicates - switching from serial to parallel. Also are there extra patch libraries? Not that I know of -- Wizoo used to do a line of presets for Emagic stuff but I don't think they ever got around to the ES2 >I like the EVOC20 for getting some fresh tones. But I am sorry I bought the >EXS24. I barely use it and find it clumsy to set up a new instrument, and >hard to figure out the file management. Its much easier to drag and drop a >load of recycle bits into Battery and have them automatically set up. The EXS24 has frustrating limitations but it is so stable - I use it more than anything else I have in the way of virtual instruments. >So this is why I want to ask about the ES's. Of course its nicer having >softsynths so there is virtually no noise and so much more control over >everything and the patches are right there to edit. Absolutely. Regards, Murray
Message
Re: [L-OT] ES2 and softsynths
2003-03-23 by Murray McDowall
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.