>When it *comes* to lyrics, fuck the grammar for sure, go with >what sounds good. I think you made the right choice unless you >want to sound like English students who are writing songs. English >grammar is whack anyway if you ask me. i never could >make any sense out of it. It's old and tired and needs a >makeover. Ebonics make much more sense as a method of >communication than straight University white people Engish. Actually I don't agree with any of that except the part where you say that if it is for lyrics he should not sweat the point. Anyway having taught English to non-native speakers for about 18 years has given me a lot of opportunities to appreciate the power of the language to convey meanings in subtle and elegant ways. That is of course assuming that everyone understands the rules. Slashing it apart and applying a bunch of funky contractions may be a lot of fun and that is reason enough to do it but it certainly will not improve the capability of the language to convey meaning. All it really does is help to place the speaker/writer into whatever group it is that he wants to represent himself as being affiliated with. As for it needing a make over, yes and no. No it does need one because it just got one yesterday and will get another one today and another one tomorrow so yes it needs one so it is always getting one. What it does not need is to be divided in a radical way into new and old and have "new" be dumbed down so as to make it difficult for young people only familiar with the new to benefit from the enormous body of wisdom the old version has to offer. It also is a serious tool for about 2 or 3 billion people to who speak it as a second language to communicate not only with native speakers but also with other non English speakers so drastically altering it can end up screwing with peoples ability to talk things out rather than shoot things out. No matter what a deeper understanding of grammar and the logic behind it is never a bad thing and can actually be quite enjoyable.
Message
[L-OT] Re: Grammar...
2003-09-02 by Dennis Gunn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.