> This is not the point of having irrational time signatures, nothing about 5/5 or 3/5 etc is mathematically "irrational"... > and furthermore is an incorrect definition of 5/5. 5/5 does exist (time > signatures are just simple maths) time sigs are •not• maths....the top is a number (granted) but the bottom is a *name* - like minim or "4 or "8". these *names* are related to each other by composer direction - a change from 2/4 to 2/8 does not imply a halving of the length of the bar. > as do 3/5 7/5 etc. They are not > theoretical or open to interpretation any more than 4/4 is. they are a kludgy way to modulate tempo. they lose musical distinction between stuff like 5/4 and 5/8. time sigs PLUS tempo marks are very powerful. trying to make time sigs INCLUDE tempo marks or tempo gradations loses time sig functionality. like using a piccolo to crack a nut....... all the best steve parker steve parker
Message
Re: [L-OT] time sigs
2004-02-18 by steve parker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.