--- In logic-ot@yahoogroups.com, steve parker <swimorsync@n...> wrote: > > as do 3/5 7/5 etc. They are not > > theoretical or open to interpretation any more than 4/4 is. > > they are a kludgy way to modulate tempo. > they lose musical distinction between stuff like 5/4 and 5/8. > > time sigs PLUS tempo marks are very powerful. > trying to make time sigs INCLUDE tempo marks or tempo gradations loses > time sig functionality. > > like using a piccolo to crack a nut....... > steve parker I think this part all depends on what kind of music you are doing. Sometimes writing a tempo change instead of a tuplet produces undesireable results, especially in groove oriented music with a single pulse throughout the song. I can't imagine Zappa would have used a tempo change to express the irregular rhythms in the Black Page with that 1/4 note kik going all the way through. I've never seen the score but it seems like all tuplets to me. I think tempo change work great for rubato pieces. They are obviously much simpler to read than odd denomiator time sigs. chop that beat Teddy Kumpel
Message
Re: [L-OT] time sigs
2004-02-18 by Teddy
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.