<TazmnianDv@...> wrote: > ... if you move a kit, and then open a logic song with that kit, you get a > message asking for some specific sample file - but the window is unmovable so > you can't see the other names, nor search for what kit that file occurs in - > thus you would need to know the name of the kit in advance. Well, at least Battery gives you an option to search all your HDs for that sample. Better than nothing, even if it might take a while. However, when working with Battery, as soon as I'm halfway done, I save all my patches in my song folder. > ... the multiple outputs works....but there is no way you would be able to > guess that - and everyone asks about it - in no way intuitive Honestly, this I like in Battery. The non-intuitive thing here might be Logic's way of handling multiple outputs, but even that is fine with me. > nonetheless they never made any changes in two > years. A shame indeed. For I while I was posting tons of possible enhancements in N.I.'s forum and got almost only positive responses, even from some N.I. employees... thus, nothing happened at all. > The two features about Battery I like over the EXS - > 1. You can drag and drop a bunch of samples and have them load sequentially > automatically > 2. individually tweak samples in many ways. I'd like to add that it's a REAL shame that you need to save a patch first with the EXS to work with it at all. There's no other sample based virtual instrument requiring such a nonsense. No matter if it's Kontakt, Battery, HALion or whatever... you just load a sample and play it, everything is saved within the song, you only need to do a "save patch as" whenever you'd like to re-use this certain patch in any other song. > Why can't just one company get it right? You better ask them - but most likely they won't answer. Sascha
Message
Re: [L-OT] Battery drums
2004-04-05 by Sascha Franck
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.