--- In logic-ot@yahoogroups.com, Murray McDowall <murraymc@m...> wrote: > Gswerner2002 quoted a bunch of stuff not written by me: > > >--- In logic-ot@yahoogroups.com, Murray McDowall <murraymc@m...> wrote: > >> At 09:01 PM 6/4/05 +0100, you wrote: > >> >There's been repeated rumours of this recently - one > >> >Apple spokesman even saying that it's as perennial > >> >as Halley's Comet - but this really does look like it's > >> >kosher...I don't know whether to laugh or cry. > > And then added: > > > And I've been considering the move to Mac because they've stuck to > >their guns through the corporate monarchy era. I enjoyed playing with > >PC's, but having been given so much control in the computer world, > >Gates started to think it was all his. I hope Apple doesn't go that > >route also because I belive people are finally sick of Gates and > >Windows. He has managed to get his operating systems into computers for > >a long time now and each new upgrade has been so full of flaws that > >most users that I know are just plain sick to death of him. Hopefully, > >the Intel parts match the integrity Apple is expecting them to have. > > M$ bashing, while enjoyable sport, is not very relevant to the current > developments. I find it odd that you are dubious about the "integrity" of > Intel's parts. While their marketing has led the architecture by the nose > for some years and some recent chips (eg Prescott) have run very hot (for > the same reasons the latest G5s are noisy) they run code as expected. Most > of the world's business and communications runs on x86 and has done for > quite a while. If you run binaries - Unix, Linux, Win32 or 64 - the > processor spits out the expected results. As the presentation said - all > the versions of OSX for the last five years have been compiled to run on > Intel. This is not surprising given that the Unix base on which OSX is > built is native to Intel. > > Regards, > Murray Probably don't need to worry about fbi or cia coming to get ya or anything like that, just an observation of things.
Message
Re: [L-OT] Developments: The First Church of Appliantology
2005-06-07 by gswerner2002
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.