Yahoo Groups archive

The Logic Off Topic list

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Thread

LAWP:Age Old Mobo search

LAWP:Age Old Mobo search

2001-08-04 by david@floydsproduce.com

Hey,

  I'm thinking that a lot of the troubles that I have with Logic, are 
mobo related, and  because of a lot of junk on my system. So I'm gonna 
build another computer just for Logic, and a couple more audio 
programs, but nothing else. I'll network it from another internet 
connected computer that I'll do all my other stuff on. 

  I was thinking the rme reference PC, with an Asus cusl2 mobo, with 
as fast a processor it will work with. So maybe a PIII Coppermine 1ghz 
or even faster if I can. I'll put in 512mb of PC133. IDE 7200rpm 
drives,  maybe raid0 later on. I run 98se. Win2000 when Logic will 
support it.

  That ref PC on the rme site has been there for a while. Since things 
 can change drastically with computers, does anyone know whether that 
ref PC should be updated with a new and improved mobo and processor, 
or is that a good safe system that will consistently run Logic trouble 
free. I'll use Hammerfall9652, Matrox G400, Unitor8mkIII, and Adaptec 
2940U2W Scsi card for HP9210i CDRW, and a good 300 watt PS. 

  I'm ready to order, and I just thought I'd try to get some comments 
on the latest talk about Logic and reliable CPU's that are trouble 
free.

Thanks so much,

David Floyd

SV: [L-OT] LAWP:Age Old Mobo search

2001-08-04 by Per Boysen

Hi David,

You can check out existing systems that work well and stable at http://www.digitalnaturalsound.com/logic_dsp/perform.shtml 

I'm also going to upgrade this autumn and I'm thinking about that upcoming Athlon processor, called "Palomino". Should be great for Logic from what I have understood, since it will benefit from Logic being optimised for SSE code. Oh well, we'll see when it's out. Regarding mobo I was reading at ProRec http://www.prorec.com/prorec/articles.nsf/articles/D6A94D6B2F7DA99186256A7F00747CC9 where Pete Leoni does strongly recommend the The Iwill KK266 Motherboard. Read that one if you haven't already done so. 

Anoyone on the LUG with an Iwill KK266 ? Can I Get A Witness?

Regards

¨per
--------------------------------------------
  BOYSEN MUSIK MEDIA INTERNET
  Url: http://www.boysen.se       
  Mail: per@...
  Phone: int + 46 (08) 34 11 81
-------------------------------------------- 

  -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
  Från: david@... [mailto:david@...]
  Skickat: den 4 augusti 2001 19:08
  Till: logic-ot@yahoogroups.com
  Ämne: [L-OT] LAWP:Age Old Mobo search


  Hey,

    I'm thinking that a lot of the troubles that I have with Logic, are 
  mobo related, and  because of a lot of junk on my system. So I'm gonna 
  build another computer just for Logic, and a couple more audio 
  programs, but nothing else. I'll network it from another internet 
  connected computer that I'll do all my other stuff on. 

    I was thinking the rme reference PC, with an Asus cusl2 mobo, with 
  as fast a processor it will work with. So maybe a PIII Coppermine 1ghz 
  or even faster if I can. I'll put in 512mb of PC133. IDE 7200rpm 
  drives,  maybe raid0 later on. I run 98se. Win2000 when Logic will 
  support it.

    That ref PC on the rme site has been there for a while. Since things 
  can change drastically with computers, does anyone know whether that 
  ref PC should be updated with a new and improved mobo and processor, 
  or is that a good safe system that will consistently run Logic trouble 
  free. I'll use Hammerfall9652, Matrox G400, Unitor8mkIII, and Adaptec 
  2940U2W Scsi card for HP9210i CDRW, and a good 300 watt PS. 

    I'm ready to order, and I just thought I'd try to get some comments 
  on the latest talk about Logic and reliable CPU's that are trouble 
  free.

  Thanks so much,

  David Floyd


  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.