Yahoo Groups archive

The Logic Off Topic list

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Thread

Re: [L-OT] OT?

Re: [L-OT] OT?

2002-10-16 by Tobias Seyb

Hi fellow citizens of planet terra,

could you

PLEASE

stop this mega-OT thing and return to logic related topics????
Or, if I asked too much, please set the subject to L-AOT, so others can set
a filter.

This L-OT list could serve as a nice forum for what it was started, but I
(and maybe other working people) get tired of hitting the delete button all
day long.

peace & please,


Tobias

Re: [L-OT] OT?

2002-10-16 by ObliviƤn | Bacteria AS

From: "Tobias Seyb" <tobias.seyb@...>
> This L-OT list could serve as a nice forum for what it was started, but I
> (and maybe other working people) get tired of hitting the delete button
all
> day long.

You're right, let's get back to Logic. This discussion is getting out of
hand anyways...

Re: [L-OT] OT?

2002-10-17 by Sumit Das

From: "mercutio" <mercutio@...>
> While I don't disagree, 2 points:
> 
> 1. the sectarian politics differ in content only from similar 
> discussions - i.e best platform, best sequencer - which are frequent on 
> this list

This list, and all others, are defined by their (intended) content.


> 2. On political matters, silence always favors the status quo - it is 
> never neutral. Not here, not on the street corner, not in the media, 
> not in the august halls of government - not anywhere. Is that a good 
> thing?

No, it's not.  Should I accost strangers on the street and scream my
political or other ideologies at them?  There is a time and a place for
everything.  I could join rec.political.arguments.about.the.middle.east
and rant about how Logic rocks, and that would not be welcomed there
I would guess.

    -smeet

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.