--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Onestone <onestone@b...> wrote: > > My old package was like that, you could initiate an action without > speciifying the target, it was one of the things I liked. But what I > really liked was the fact that it didn't use menus mostly, instead of > having to go to a menu and select PLACE-TRACK for example, as per > protel, if I wanted to start a track connecting to an existing pin I > simply moved the cursor to a point close to tha pin, or wire endpoint > and right clicked, to change track orientation I double clicked, to fix > the track I left clicked, to start a track in mid air I left clicked, > since what you do on schematics is place signals, and what you do on > PCB;s is place tracks this seems too obvious to ignore to me. To move a > signal or track you click on the point and drag, try that with protel. > protel works in different ways between Schematic and Layout, how dumb is > that! And this is in every aspect, even library maintenance, for example > in SCH I can copy a part and then edit it and rename it, in layout I > can't, or it requires a wholly different mechanicsm That is basically how Pulsonix works. A track (PCB) or net (schematic) can be started anywhere just by double clicking. Schematic and PCB work the same way, in most cases. When my previous employer tried to get me to use Eagle, I found that it required about 50% more mouse clicks than Pulsonix when doing a design. I refused to use it on health and safety grounds (I have suffered from RSI) and they let me use my own copy of Pulsonix, after a lot of arguing. Leon Leon
Message
Re: ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-04 by leon_heller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.