Joel, > > > What sort of through put are you able to sustain with your > > > code on this board? > > > > Good question, never bothered to test it. Note that uIP has some > > restrictions and doesn't interoperate well with delayed-ACK > > implementations as uIP can only have a single segment in > flight at any > > one time. If you don't understand this implication, you'll > need to have > > a look at a good book on Internet protocols or the RFCs. > > Yes, yes I'm aware of all the latter. I'm just looking for a > rough unit of > measure; To determine if it might be applicable in a > commercial product. > Perhaps it's a better fit for the hobby market? I believe uIP is now used in a number of commercial products and I'd say that it isn't just for a hobby market. I have uIP running on an EDTP AirDrop-A with a WiFi driver I wrote and integrated into uIP so I can telnet into the AVR wirelessly and run my NetBASIC interpreter on it. -- Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, AVR and now MAXQ processors
Message
RE: [lpc2000] Problems with olimex (wiggler) jtag and olimex lpc2129 proto board
2005-11-25 by Paul Curtis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.