----- Original Message ----- From: "Bertrik Sikken" <bertrik@...> To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 8:23 PM Subject: Re: [lpc2000] Re: JTAG Programmer Confusion - Noob Question > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Leon Heller wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "sixtyfivebit" <sixtyfivebit@...> >>> I'm glad this thread is helping other people, and after some research >>> things are a bit more clear... >>> >>> Since I really don't want to buy a wiggler and would rather build one >>> my self (for experience, learning, etc.), is there any particular >>> schematic I should go with? >>> >>> Leon_Heller, nice site and I saw your prototype page earlier >>> (bookmarked it), but I couldn't find your jtag.zip. I went through >>> most of the pages on your site but didn't see it... did I miss >>> something? >> >> It's in this groups Files area. > > Hi Leon, > > Sorry if I'm asking a stupid question (I'm not a hardware designer), > but is your circuit safe for the parallel port? > > As far as I can see the 74HC244 takes its VCC from the 3.3V from > the target board while the 5V parallel port signals are directly > connected to the inputs of the HC244. In the HC244 datasheet I > notice that there are protection diodes between the inputs and > Vcc / ground. > > It looks like there is a current path from the 5V parallel ports pins > through the HC244 protection diodes into the target 3.3V without any > obvious current limit. Doesn't this risk blowing out the parallel port > drivers? Also, wouldn't this lift the 3.3V on the target to a possibly > dangerous voltage? It would be better to use a 74AC244, but I don't have any problems with it as it is. Leon --- [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are currently using to read this email. ]
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: JTAG Programmer Confusion - Noob Question
2005-12-08 by Leon Heller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.