Hello Rui, Ake write >With en error less then 1% there should be no problem for CAN. I think so too. > Did you test your CAN settings over a large cable (500m)? Not yet, only a few meters. > Did you test the CAN comunication between your ARM and another > equipment or with 2 ARM with the same settings? At the moment I communicate with a CAN to USB Dongle and it worked perfect. http://www.peak-system.com/db/gb/pcanusb_gb.html Best regards, Martin > Hello guys and thank you very much for your fast answers. > > I'm thinking in doing this. > Use a 15MHz cristal. > Use PLL to set cclk to 60MHz. > Set VPDIV to define pclk to 60Mhz. > > With this settings I have 0% error in defining the CAN baud rate > and a maximum of 1.72% error in RS-232 baud rate at 115.200. > At 19.200 I get 0.16% error. In this group I found that RS323 > error should be less than 3% so I think I'm OK. > > I think it's better to have no error in CAN than in RS-232. > In CAN if the cable is to long I get errors due to the baud > rate setting and errors do to the size of the cable. > > Am I right? Any comments? > > Martin: > Did you test your CAN settings over a large cable (500m)? > Did you test the CAN comunication between your ARM and another > equipment or with 2 ARM with the same settings? > > Regards. > Rui > > > > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Ake Hedman, eurosource" <akhe@b...> > wrote: >> >> Martin Steppuhn wrote: >> >> > Hello Rui, >> > >> > I 'am using the LPC2129 an there ist the same "problem". >> > >> > You can fix it with the CAN setup by chosing a time quanta >> > with a low error in the CANBTR. >> > >> > For 14,7456 MHz and 125k CAN Buadrate my settings for CANBTR are: >> > >> > #define CALC_BRP_43 0x0000002A >> > #define CALC_SJW_1 0x00000000 >> > #define CALC_TSEG1_8 0x00070000 >> > #define CALC_TSEG2_2 0x00100000 >> > >> > #define CANBitrate125k CALC_BRP_43 | CALC_SJW_1 | > CALC_TSEG1_8 | >> > CALC_TSEG2_2 >> > >> > Error: -0,24% >> > >> > You can find additional infos in: >> > http://www.hitex.co.uk/arm/lpc2000book/index.html >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Martin >> > >> > >> > >> >> With en error less then 1% there should be no problem for CAN. >> >> Cheers >> /Ake >> >> -- >> --- >> Ake Hedman (YAP - Yet Another Programmer) >> eurosource, Brattbergavagen 17, 820 50 LOS, Sweden >> Phone: (46) 657 413430 Cellular: (46) 73 0533 146 >> Company home: http://www.eurosource.se >> Kryddor/Te/Kaffe: http://www.brattberg.com >> Personal homepage: http://www.eurosource.se/akhe >> Automated home: http://www.vscp.org >> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: CAN bit timming vs RS232
2006-01-04 by Martin Steppuhn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.