Lpc2000

At 03:55 PM 2/22/04 -0500, you wrote:
>You're right about the context of the processor status save.  The only
>reason I can think of for modifying the PSW like that would be in a task
>switcher of some kind.

hmm, I don't yet see where that would be useful in a task switch but maybe 
it can happen as a side effect.  I've got a thread to worry at 
anyway.  Atmel went to a lot of trouble for a workaround so there must be 
some reason to do it.  Something to puzzle away at for a bit,

Robert

" 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
chew a radio signal. "

                         Kelvin Throop, III