On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:36:39AM +1100, microbit wrote: > Hi Bill (Wiese), > > > You do have to know that the LPC21xx parts are intended as low-cost > > microcontrollers - that is, 32-bit successors to 8051-like devices. > > They're not positioned as ARM "system chips" like other ARM devices. > > In the grand scheme of things the ARM CPU core itself prob doesn't take > > much more die space than an 8051 core. The flash (charge pumps) and RAM > > will take more area, so the ARM core is a cheap way of selling more > > silicon ;) > > I read your post with great interest, and as you can tell I'm quite new to > ARM. > It seems sign of the times is that we can expect single chip RF ICs with MCU > on-board to run ARM rather than the 8051 sooner than later, so I really need > to get in on the game :-) > > I found thsi interesting article here : > http://www.heyrick.co.uk/assembler/history.html > > I had no idea ARM came from Acorn ? <nostalgia> I remember when I was lucky to have an ARM2 in my Acorn A3000! (those where the days, a man, his machine, and only a copy of BBC BASIC Assemler for company) </nostalgia> I'm sure there must be others on here who've been working with ARM at least as long? -- Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Digest Number 96
2004-02-22 by Ben Dooks
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.