> > Paul what where the big differences between lwIP and uIP? > > lwIP has a sockets-like API, uIP doesn't. lwIP has many more > TCP/IP-related features than uIP does (windowing, for example) and will > potentially have a better throughput for applications that are streaming > data. uIP has a single segment in flight at any time hence falls foul > of delayed ACK implementations of TCP/IP (cf Windows at least). uIP > applications are harder to write than lwIP apps as uIP does not use > threads (but there is something called protothreads that you *can* use > to make life easier). lwIP is bigger in RAM and code size, uIP is small > in both. uIP runs a full web server on MSP430s in 8K of code with a > fully-compliant stack and less than 1K of memory (and that's with a big > packet buffer). > > If you have space issues, uIP is the way to go. If you don't, then lwIP > is more the thing. Paul thanks for the excellent summation. Can anyone with Ethernet Nut/Net experience comment? Joel
Message
RE: [lpc2000] tcpip
2006-01-15 by Joel Winarske
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.