Lpc2000

brendanmurphy37 wrote:

>Tom,
>
>I'm inclined to agree with Paul and just bow out of this discussion, 
>which is going nowhere and is certainly off-topic.
>
>However, before doing this, I would point out that you can't 
>copyright an algorithm.
>
>Common practice, and I see nothing wrong with it despite your 
>objection, is to copyright all source code that is created within an 
>organisation. If it's a straight copy of something else, that's 
>something else. From what Paul says, it sounds like what he's done is 
>a long way from a straight copy (unless I missed the XML addendum to 
>the Philips documantation, that is)
>
>  
>
You are confusing copyright with compensation.

Regards,

TomW

-- 
Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant
http://openhardware.net, http://cyberiansoftware.com
"Windows? No thanks, I have work to do..."
----------------------------------------------------