Lpc2000

Sean, 
the reason (for me) would be that it would be simpler on the LPC 
board, no need for FAT etc (I'm actually also looking into prllc's FAT 
implementation with SD support at $139,- which I think is very 
reasonable). Also I'm a little worried that the card will be "killed" 
by problems with write-endurance (if using FAT, the FAT tables are 
written very often), and if used as a circular buffer, each sector 
will be written (relatively) seldom.

Regards,
Carsten


--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Sean <embeddedrelated@w...> wrote:
>
> 
> This may be a stupid question, why not just use a file system?  I 
believe 
> that there is some code available for FAT file system access on 
SD/MMC for 
> LPC series, wouldn't that make things a lot easier?  This way you 
can use 
> any existing application without any special need for programming or 
> unix-style commands.
> 
> -- Sean
>