tsvetanusunov <tusunov@...> schrieb am Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:42:53 -0000: >> Atmel already have SAM7X with embedded ethernet or at least an >> evaluation board. > > ok, but what you really benefit from the embedded MAC when you anyway > will need external PHY connected to the chip? > > I'll tell you from manufacturing point of view: almost nothing, no > space saving, no price reduction, still two chip solution the price > difference between MAC+PHY chip is just add to the SAM7S vs. SAM7X > price. But from the programming point an embedded MAC is easier and faster unless you use an external MAC+Phy which completely is memory mapped. I wonder, is there no connector with integrated Phy ? > So why do you need SAM7X instead SAM7S+ENC28J60 for instance? > ENC28J60 nice and small footprint taking only *few* uC ports, ohh > yeah well it takes 250mA while running at 10Mbit... so what? I don't Your power-regulators on the board must be layed out for this too. > intent to use it in battery powered equipment and the power adapter > will source these 250mA without problem, and 10Mbit cover most of > embedded applications these microcontrollers can be used for. What about PoE ? How much can this drive ? > So just think again, why do you need microcontroller with only MAC > embedded? BTW: Freescale should present soon a Coldfire with MAC+Phy (as the NE64). -- 42Bastian Schick
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: ethernet, BGA conspiracy and uncle SAM(7X)
2006-01-31 by 42Bastian Schick
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.