On 1 Feb 2006 at 6:34, 42Bastian Schick wrote: > ntfreak2000 <ntfreak2@...> schrieb am Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:18:20 > -0000: > > > I would second that - cvs is getting rather dated now. > > You can use TortoiseSVN on your windose box > > I am using CVS (cvsnt on Windows) for quiete a while and have to say, > that the SVN version-number style is rather *hmm* strange. > > But you are right, esp. many OpenSource projects switch to SVN. > > One major advantage of SVN is, that you can diff off-line as it pulls > the whole database on your local disc. > > One major disadvantage is, that it is not as easy to setup a server. > It is just as easy to setup a SVN server if one do not require the use of the http and/or https protocols. If one are using either the svn:// or file:/// access methods, then setting up a SVN server is about equivalent to setting up a CVS server. Unfortunately the documentation uses the http:// protocol almost exclusively in it's examples. Using tortoiseSVN under windows works very well and is very easy to use. Regards Anton Erasmus -- A J Erasmus
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: CVS
2006-02-01 by Anton Erasmus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.