Lpc2000

You'd be better off switching to Win2K now.  You'll get better performance 
and far more reliably that you will with the toy OS called Win98SE.

	java, eh?  And you've found that to be portable?  This seems to be contrary 
to the opinions of friends of mine that do Java development, and constantly 
bitch about cross-platform incompatibilities.  Between Sun, BlackDown, and 
MS, few things seem to run on all platforms.

	--jc

On Thursday 20 November 2003 01:16 am, microbit wrote:
>  > compiler, assembler, linker etc. Unfortunately, HI-TIDE is written in
>
>  Java,
>
>  > which makes it rather slow and clunky. For some reason, the only sample
>
>  It does run a bit slow, but I presume that it is interpreted to make it
>  totally platform/OS
>  independent. ???? (ie. a lot of added value for the vendor and client)
>
>  This is a massive investment upfront, and will require faster machines
> than mine (:-)-
>  but later on new features can be just plugged in "as is" without native
>  Windows yet again giving you
>  _bloody_ nightmares.
>  I think it has its merits, it indicates a strong, long term commitment by
>  the tool vendor if my presumption
>  above is correct - Clyde ?
>
>  When we all bought out first 486DX100 we all thought we had the "bee's
>  knees".
>  Who would want one now ?
>  IOW there is/will be faster machines around (addmitedly I am running on
> only an AMD750
>  with WIN98SE)
>
>  I'll go to XP-or-whatever-the-latest-craze-is when I get a 2 GHz machine.
>
>
>  Kris
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  lpc2100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.