Leon Heller wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Tom Walsh" <tom@...> >To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com> >Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 3:19 PM >Subject: Re: [lpc2000] Rise and fall time of capture inputs > > > > >>widescreen03608 wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hi all, >>> >>>On the CAP0.3 input I have pulses from an encoder and I want detect >>>both edges and generate interrupts. The signal is filtered so the rise >>>and fall time are slow (don't know exactly how long, but surely within >>>1ms). Is it possible that no interrupt is generated on CAP0.3, because >>>the signal is to slow? >>> >>>I didn't found any datasheets from Philips which this is described. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Aside from the datasheet thing, wouldn't it be possible to use a schmidt >>gate to drive the capture intput? Or some op-amp crossing-detector with >>hysteresis? >> >> > >I've done that in the past with that sort of input. I then had a problem >with multiple signals (like contact bounce) which I eliminated with >software. > > > Yes, that is a given when dealing with mechanical contacts. They do bounce. As far as that goes, analog lines can "bounce", inductance. TomW -- Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant http://openhardware.net, http://cyberiansoftware.com "Windows? No thanks, I have work to do..." ----------------------------------------------------
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Rise and fall time of capture inputs
2006-02-03 by Tom Walsh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.