Bob, Those who feel offended when I point out deficiencies in boot loader implementation please do not read further. I found that the need to specify CPU clock frequency at run-time IMO causes a number of problems including the one you pointed out. Sometimes CPU clock is changed at runtime based for power considerations you have to keep track of this for IAP calls. Flash programming requires three parameters relating to CPU clock. The first two of these, relating to writing to LPC timing registers #1 and #2 appear to accept a large degree of variation, at least 1:4 in my case. I did away with the need for CPU clock at the third instance where boot loader IAP implementation uses CPU clock parameter. After issuing a flash command, it is possible to determine when this is complete by examining LPC flash controller status register. I do this, but boot loader code does not. Instead, it waits for a programmed number of cycles based on the supplied clock frequency. When the programmer inadvertently supplies a low clock speed, the IAP call terminates before the flash controller is ready, and you can see that what happens after this is indeterminate. Worse, it can permanently destroy the part. It appears that for the timing register parameters accept quite a large variance, at least 1 to 4 variance in my case. If Philips would disclose what are these limits are, it is possible one could do away with need for CPU clock frequency altogether for IAP or ISP calls. My experience is limited to boards with 14M7456 crystals and with PLL speeds between 1 to 4 times that. Regards, Jaya --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "lpc2100_fan" <lpc2100_fan@...> wrote: > > Tom, > > I am absolutely certain about this, it has been verified with Philips. > Each IAP call needs to have the frequence the device is currently > running at. If the PLL is active the parameter needs to be PLL*ext. Freq. > > The "funny" part is, it works ALMOST all the time even with the wrong > frequency. > > Bob Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
Message
Re: IAP and then strange behavior
2006-02-04 by Jayasooriah
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.