Thanks, Richard. I'll try to dig deeper on it. Guille --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "robertadsett" <subscriptions@...> wrote: > > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Guillermo Prandi" > <yahoo.messenger@> wrote: > > > > Yes, with LPC you can tell the source of the startup, but in this > > case the startup is hardware-originated, so I am pretty sure it is > > hardware. You suggest that the processor doesn't clear the proper > > bits for the bootloader to tell? > > I'm suggesting it needs to be verified one way or the other. > Certainly the observed behaviour suggests that as a possibility. > > There are, of course, many ways to implement this reset source > recognition but one way is to write a bit into a register for > occurances other than power on. These bits are then never cleared and > so are always set the way they were last set. A power on > automatically clears the register. > > ISTR a Motorola micro that behaved in that fashion, there was an > explicit line in the user manual saying that the reset source register > should be cleared in order to properly recognize the source of > subsequent resets. Consider that an incentive to throughly read the > user manual, miss one line and spend days tracking down what seems to > be odd behaviour ;) > > Robert > > " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself. There are always restrictions, > be > they legal, genetic, or physical. If you don't believe me, try to > chew a > radio signal. " -- Kelvin Throop, III > http://www.aeolusdevelopment.com/ >
Message
Re: Fwd: Bootloader not always invoked after reset with P0.14 low
2006-02-07 by Guillermo Prandi
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.