Lpc2000

Brendan, I have asked you twice and twice you have not been able to point 
out which of the facts (F1-F5) you consider not true or not relevant in 
making the remark "A set of 'facts' that may or may not be either true or 
relevant does not an argument make."

You do not have to concur with my analysis.  There are those who do and 
there are those who dont, and there is nothing unusual about their 
distribution.

Better kill the thread so Robert (of Philips) does not get too frustrated ...

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "brendanmurphy37" <brendan.murphy@...> wrote:

 > > If there are any "facts" (F1 through F5) that are not true, or not
 > relevant
 > > for that matter, please point this out.
 > >
 >
 > I deliberately chose not to do a point-by-point comment on your own
 > analysis ...

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com