I don't understand very well what is it that you want me to test. By clearing the watchdog flags my problem went away. Guille --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Jayasooriah <jayasooriah@...> wrote: > > Hi Guile, > > I am looking at what appears to be a different manifestation of the problem > you encountered in that power cycling is required to recover form a lockup > in order to transfer control to ISP by pulling P0.14 low. > > Philips explains this happens can if "timeout value is too small". The > user manual seems to say writing anything less than 0xff will result in > minimum timeout of PCLK x 256 x 4. > > The test code below then should create the lockup scenario, but it does not > on my 2292. I cannot see where I got it wrong. > > Can you try this on your board please? > > Thanks. > > Jaya > > GNU Source: > > >@ ====================================================================== > >@ Interrupt Vectors > > > > .code 32 > > > > @ entry points vector > >start: > > ldr pc, =error > > ldr pc, =error > > ldr pc, =error > > ldr pc, =error > > ldr pc, =error > > ldr pc, =error > > ldr pc, =error > > ldr pc, =error > > > > .ltorg > > > >@ End of Interrupt Vectors > >@ ====================================================================== > > > > > >@ ====================================================================== > >@ Error Scenario > > > > .code 32 > > > >error: > > @ force reset > > ldr r0, =WATCH_DOG > > mov r1, #3 > > str r1, [r0, #0] > > str r1, [r0, #4] @ WDTC = 3 > > mov r1, #0xaa > > str r1, [r0, #8] @ WDFEED = 0xaa > > mov r1, #0x55 > > str r1, [r0, #8] @ WDFEED = 0x55 > > b . > > > >@ End Error Scenario > >@ ====================================================================== > > HEX Binary: (vectors not check-sum patched) > > >:1000000018F09FE514F09FE510F09FE50CF09FE5D8 > >:1000100008F09FE504F09FE500F09FE504F01FE580 > >:10002000240000000E02A0E30310A0E3001080E50E > >:10003000041080E5AA10A0E3081080E55510A0E3A5 > >:08004000081080E5FEFFFFEA55 > >:00000001FF > > > >Message: 17 > > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:30:37 -0000 > > From: "Guillermo Prandi" <yahoo.messenger@...> > >Subject: Re: Bootloader not always invoked after reset with P0.14 low > > > >Hi, Jayasooriah. Indeed the watchdog is the problem. At this stage of > >development I am only using the watchdog to provide a software reset > >function. Apparently this behavior is triggering only after using > >this function. And yes, you are right; the bit should be cleared by > >the external reset. > > > >It looks like this behavior is 'by design' so there is no other > >workaround than switching off the unit. > > > >Guille > > > >Message: 8 > > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:28:38 -0000 > > From: "philips_apps" <philips_apps@...> > >Subject: Re: Bootloader not always invoked after reset with P0.14 low > > > >The bootloader does not look at the RISR register. It looks at the > >WDTOF flag in WDMOD register. > >Even clearing of watchdog flag in user application may not help (if > >timeout is too small) because the bootloader runs before application. > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com >
Message
Re: Bootloader not always invoked after reset with P0.14 low
2006-02-25 by Guillermo Prandi
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.