Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: read wrong part id of lpc2136

2006-03-26 by Jayasooriah

Hello,

Sorry I mistakenly said you should use the space bar.  As the on-line 
manual says, the use the '?' character to print memory limits.

Jaya

>Message: 2
>    Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 01:57:52 +1100
>    From: Jayasooriah <jayasooriah@...>
>Subject: Re: read wrong part id of lpc2136
>
>Hi Pandurang,
>
>Alternatively you can use my loader available at:
>
>    http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~jayas/esdk/sill.html
>
>which reports top ROM (flash) and RAM addresses when you hit the space bar.

CORRECTION: not space bar, but the '?' character ... see the on-line manual.


>I expect the addresses you get will correspond to LPC2131.
>
>The difference between LPC2136 and LPC2131 inside the package is the part
>ID that is stored in the boot parameter block.  The boot loader loads this
>part ID to a special register on startup and this determines how much RAM
>and ROM is enabled.
>
>I too am interested in what you find out.
>
>Jaya
>
>--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Peter Jakacki <peterjak@...> wrote:
>  >
>  > It is possible that it is branded incorrectly or that an incorrect ID
>  > has been loaded. What you can do is to construct a 32K dummy file to
>  > confirm that it does load and then step it up to 64K, 128K and so on
>  > until you ascertain the memory size.
>  >
>  > Once you are sure of your facts you can go back to your supplier to
>  > rectify the situation.
>  >
>  > Either way, let us know what you found out.
>  >
>  > *Peter*
>
>
>Pandurang Shinde wrote:
>  > thanks Peter for reply, on the chip it is printed as
>  >
>LPC2136FBD64
>  >
>S60735.1        04
>  >
>ZPG0602B
>  >
>  >                       So i am concludung that is LPC2136 only ,but reading
>LPC2131.
>  >                       Why this happen.
>  >                       Can u suggest any solution for it.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.