--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Frantz Robinson" <frantz.robinson@...> wrote: > > A lot of great ideas here, thank you and thanks to everyone who > responded! > IT seems to me there are some recurring themes; > It makes me wonder if there isn't an opportunity here to define a very > minimalist open standard, miniature SBC format specifically tailored to > existing and foreseeable capabilities of the Philips LPC ARM MCU's( no > harm if others want to support it too) which allows any vendor to make > compatible but unique CPU boards and expansion modules which could be > mixed & matched to assemble any kind of ARM-based embedded product- or > is it just late and I've started to hallucinate? ;-) Franz, In my experience evaluation/developementboards don't last much longer than a week before the end up on the big pile in the closet. I don't like to do things twice, so I reather develope software on the end-product. In that perspective, there's nothing wrong with the concept of using a plug-on board for both evaluation as well as for your end-product. Most software guys don't want to bother with all the hardware for each new application, and they shouldn't. Within our company we do a lot of projects and everyone seems to use his own favorite chips and developement tools. In practice this means that no one is able to service the projects of others... We use al kind of PIC's, 8051's, c167, AVR's and ARM's. (besides from bigger proc's) A short time ago we decided to switch over to one single family for all future projects, if posible. it seems to me that the LPC-ARM is the most suitable family for this. Starting with LPC2101 and up to the LPC2888(at this moment) Standardising software is even more rewarding. What I'm trying to say is that it is better(and cheaper) to use a standardised half-product for small series (and evaluation too) with plenty of extra memory and peripherals and above all standard software libs. If you are building a product in bigger quant. you want to have a tailor made board anyhow...besides that, chips like LPC288X with fine-pitch BGA are hardly suitable in small series. So in my point of view, it would be nice to have a open standard for LPC2xxx plug-on boards. I have to make something like this anyway. If I can then build my application board and buy a proc-board for it, it'll save me a lot of time in the future. Processor-boards that are used more frequently, we can make ourselves...seems fair. I wouldn't mind putting some time into it, if anyone is interested. Frank
Message
Re: help define a LPC2888 demo board and you can get one free!
2006-04-07 by frankdejonge99
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.