Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: Re: Re: 2103 forces dual supply?

2006-04-26 by Steve Franks

>Well considering the 2103 claims a typical operating current on the 1V8
supply of from 7mA to 41mA you are already in a different league.  Three
orders of magnitude is not easily crossed.

Not necissarially - the AtMega128 8-bit Avr sucks a healthy 10mA when
operating at 8MHz.

I did the calculations and when a mote is operating (sample sensors, tx
data) for 10mS every 60s, you have a 6000:1 duty cycle, so your 10mA looks
like 1.6uA.  Therefore the sleep current is the dominant drain on your
batteries.  TI's vey best LDO's eat 10uA Iq, so you're looking at two LDO's
doubling your dominant current consumption.  Can take a mote's effective
deployed life down accordingly.

As people mentioned, having as much board eaten by regulators as the
processor is quite anoying as well.

I suppose the ideal solution is a discrete watchdog chip which would pull up
the power supplies on interrupt long enough for the chip to boot.  Adds yet
more mm-sq to your design, and I doubt very much I can find one of those to
run at 10uA.

Well, I'm out.  Maybe Philips will take notice and let VccIO go down
to 1.8Von their next effort.  I think it's silly to run a
3.3V rail to get a 1.8V core processor to talk to a 1.8V core FPGA which is
another thing I do....


Steve


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.