Lpc2000

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Ralph Hempel <rhempel@...> wrote:
> > My most favourite example of how not to design systems used to be a
> > certain storage oscilloscope in which the yoke drivers go up in smoke
> > each time you address the cursor to a point outside the screen.
> > 
> > I guess LPC is a modern day equivalent.
> 
> With all the negative, posts you making about the LPC
> series of parts, what is the point of your continued
> investigation of the part.

I do not know what you mean by "investigating".  I am not studying the
LPC for any purpose or anyone.  I am simply working on it for clients
and post problems as I come across them.

You seem to suggest I should not post problems in this forum, or that
I am not entitled to make a one line remark that you seem to take
issue with.

> Some of your points can be taken as "another way to do
> things" but you continue to dismiss the fact that others may do
> things differently.
> 
> By not accepting that there may be more than one way to
> do things it makes you appear to be inflexible and unwilling
> to see another point of view.

I suppose any critique can be misconstrued this way.

> Indeed, it makes you look rather arrogant, and this can be
> discovered easily by a quick Google from a prospective client.

I have no idea what you are referring to here.

Jaya