Hi John, I think you have a good point. If we can agree how the bootloader should be improved, and it remains compatible with existing hardware*, perhaps they will find the time to do it. One point though: I think the MEMMAP is done in hardware, location 0xE01FC040 on lpc2292. So I don't see how a bootloader rewrite can add an extra option here. (It makes no sense to tell the bootloader to select the RAM vectors since RAM could contain rubbish). *this constraint could be a serious limitation. But Philips will not want to break products made to their existing data sheets. Regards, Danish --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "John Heenan" <l10@...> wrote: > > I suggest a formal request be made to Philips with regard to their > bootloader for the following minor enhancements. > > None of these suggestions are strictly necessasry. The suggestions > would simply make working with the LPC slightly easier. The > suggestions are to enable a programmable flash space and interrupt > remap location modelled on the ATMEL AVR system while retaining their > current bootloader (which I have never had a problem with) which > would of course carry out the required security processing before > handing over control. The current IAP features could still be called. > > For example the CRP flash memory location could have bits read > similar to ATMEL fuse bits to decide > 1. size of a special 'boot sector' at top of flash (AVRs typically > allow four fixed sizes) > 2. whether interrupt vectors and so startup remaps to the start of > the special boot sector. > > It would also be healthy to allow MEMMAP have another value to > indcate another remapped location for interrupt vectors. > > There is clearly a lot of motivation for independent bootloaders. It > would make my programming tasks slightly easier. It could also solve > another problem by allowing independent assignment of the 'boot load' > pin, instead of pin 0.14 (which interferes with DCD input is used and > can be solved currently with the use of a hardware single logic OR > gate). > > John Heenan >
Message
Re: Bootloader minor enhancment suggestion
2006-05-01 by Danish Ali
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.