Lpc2000

At 03:54 PM 5/25/06 -0400, newmanrf@... wrote:

> > Question:  Why get rid of const?  I would have thought you would still
> > want this
> > in flash.
> >
>     Yes your right. But for now it wont hurt him to remove it as if he is
>building for flash its there and if he is building for ram its still
>there. The idea is to get the code working first and removing that
>gives him a better chance... as long as he does not run out of ram if
>he is compiling to run out of ram. So for all of us that knows what it
>does and why leave it. If it looks funky to you comment it out. You
>will know that you need it eventually.

Hmm, I would have left it in to gain the extra type checking. Always valuable.


Robert

" 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,   be 
they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to chew a 
radio signal. "  -- Kelvin Throop, III
http://www.aeolusdevelopment.com/