John, I speak for myself here, not for Clyde. > I'm more curious why companies target the Windows > market so heavily. I've been a Windows user for years. > I never liked IDEs, as most IDEs made me use thier editor > instead of my editor (yours may be different, but thing like > CodeVision were exceptionally annoying in that regard). I > use ImageCrafts AVR C compiler, and I prefer it because > it's command line invokable. Many compilation systems have command line tools so they can be used with make. ImageCraft, Hi-Tech, RAL, we all understand that some users just don't like IDEs and want the compiler, not the IDE. > I would think that considering the cost of a company > installing a Linux system (cost of hardware + cost of a > slightly less then brain-dead IT person) vs. the cost of > a Windows seat (cost of hardware + cost of brain-dead IT > person with $5000 MS certs + cost of license), that most > companies would choose to use Linux, especially if the > programmer supports his own machine (very common in > development environments). Actually, I choose to use Windows for good reason. I have more choice in application packages on Windows than on Linux. And from a development perspective, Windows with Visual C++ V6 is much more productive than GCC on Linux because the Visual C++ compiler is so much faster than GCC. I can rebuild the whole of our IDE in under five minutes on my machine, but on Linux it's an hour-long compile. What would you use? > Linux gives you windowing, it gives you a *real* > command line development environment (4DOS and Cygwin > get close, but not close enough), and it gives > the average user far more stability. I've got the Interix subsystem on XP. It's pretty good. I also run XWin-32, a paid-for X server for Windows. > My personal feeling is that the majority of companies > that only develop for > Windows do so for one major reason: Copy protection. This is where I need to *strongly* disagree. I develop for Windows because that's what the customers want and where the market is. Of all the licenses we've sold, only two customers have inquired about Linux versions of our tools and both are using Windows versions of our tools right now. The market isn't there. If it was, you'd see Linux versions of everything, I can assure you. -- Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk CrossWorks for MSP430 and ARM processors
Message
RE: [lpc2100] Hi-Tech ARM tools
2003-11-20 by Paul Curtis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.