Lpc2000

> How is the ADS compiler compared to the Keil and Rowland compilers ?

Currently both Keil and Rowland are using the GNU compiler with their own
user interface. However, we all expect Keil to come out with their own
compiler eventually.

I have many customers that are using ARM ADS 1.2, and it appears to be solid
and generate reasonable code.

However, the problem with ADS is debugging, where Flash programming for
LPC2000 is not supported. This is however easily fixed by using our EMUL-ARM
debugger ;-)  ($1495)

http://www.nohau.com/emularm/emularm-pc.html

Sten Larsson
Nohau Corp

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lasse Madsen" <lm@...>
To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 4:21 AM
Subject: [lpc2000] ADS 1.2 Compiler ...


> MessageHi All...
>
> I have the ARM ADS 1.2 compiler and saw that someone has placed a project
> for this compiler in the files section but I think its missing a project
> file ?
> does anyone have a "get going with ADS v1.2 & LCP2106" guide ?
>
> How is the ADS compiler compared to the Keil and Rowland compilers ?
>
>
> Best regards
> Lasse Madsen
>