Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: New Poll started with Wish-List for future devices

2004-06-20 by Owen Mooney

Thanks for that feedback Robert. If I can suggest 1 PIC idea, it is the interrupt on change. The level trigged interupts on the LPC21xx don't map well into typical microcontroller circuits. Edge triggered are much better. My suggestion is 2 registers for edge triggered interrupts, giving each of the 32 I/O lines 4 options for interrupts:- none, rising edge, falling edge, either edge. 

Regards

Owen

Message: 9
   Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 23:10:46 -0000
   From: "philips_apps" 
Subject: Re: New Poll started with Wish-List for future devices

Hi Owen,

we did look at the PIC12C through PIC18C and generated the LPC900 family. 
http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/selectionguides/tables/45995.html

If you want to have a look at the LPC935 and compare it with the PIC
you will find quite some competitive features also on the Philips
8-bit device. In particular the pricing combined with analog features,
Real-Time-Clock component ...

http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/pip/P89LPC935FDH.html

or a family overview here:
http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/markets/mms/products/microcontrollers/key_solutions/80c51/index.html#lpc900

This is a different ball game and you mentioned it yourself, the PIC
and the LPC900 are great I/O processors, the ARM architecture is not
optimized for I/O handling (although it is SO MUCH BETTER than DSPs).
It is optimized for data throughput at low power.

You combination preferably with a LPC900 device instead of the PIC 
is totally in line of what we are seeing. A faster high performance
CPU for the math, control, algorithm, what ever you want to call it
and a small I/O slave processor that can stay alife with very low power. 

Regards, Robert

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Owen Mooney  wrote:
> Hi Robert
> 
> Your team could look at the I/O system of the PICF877. It is superb in 
> it's choice of features. This chip was so well featured that microchip 
> did a general purpose 16 bit processor (18F452) that used exactly the 
> same I/O structure, and even made it pin compatable. It has:
> 
>     RTC with 32Khz Xtal driver and interrupt capable of waking from
  
sleep
>     SPI, I2C Serial etc
>     A/D PWM
>     Interupt on change inputs - these are VERY usefull.
>     Abilility to sleep with almost no power, but wake up when anything
>     happens.
> 
> I have built a 25 microamp data logger with this device.
> 
> What neither of these chip have of course is the ARM core and 32 bit 
> peripherals etc which is why i have migrated to Philips
> 
> I am currently designing a system with a LPC2106 and a PICF877 - using 
> the 877 as an I/O processor for the LPC2106.
> 
> Owen Mooney
  

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.