--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "mjbcswitzerland" <mjbcswitzerland@y...> wrote: > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "embyy27" <em3yy@e...> wrote: > > See "USAGE NOTES ON WATCHDOG RESET AND EXTERNAL START" on page 214 > of > > the 2124 User Manual (Dated May 03, 2004). Does this solve your > > problem. > > > I am using the LPC2106 - is this note valid for this type too? Not specifically, but you should still need to pay attention to the states of P0.14, DBGSEL, and RTCK during the watchdog reset. > > Assuming state of these pins is OK, I had the followin thoughts: > > > > You say that you have to cycle the power to recover. > > > > Did you try activating the Reset pin without removing power? > > I am using a simple external brown-out detector without reset > capability (no push button required) therefore I have to cycle the > power for a reset. When I get a chance I will verify that the > hardware is not locked up. > You should be able to test this by just momentarily jumpering the RESET pin to ground. (I assume that the output of your reset/brown- out chip is short circuit protected.) As to your earlier question: "In short - is the internal one of real use in a critical application?," I believe it is not. In addition to the processor always starting up with reset disabled (as you have noted), there is also no protection for over-writing the WDTC register (as someone else noted). Writing 0xFFFFFFFF to this register would give a watchdog time greater than 19 minutes for a typical 14.7456 MHz pclk - vitually worthless in most applications. I don't understand why Philips bothered to protect the WDEN and WDRESET bits without protecting the WDTC register!
Message
Re: Internal Watchdog - pros and cons
2004-07-09 by embyy27
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.