--- In lpc2100@yahoogroups.com, "lpc2100_fan" <lpc2100_fan@y...> wrote: > > > ??? Since the LPCs have no ext buses, only GPIO, you have no choice but > > to bit-bang the interface. So it really seems to boil down to how many > > GPIOs you want to spend on the interface. If you want to be sure that > > you'll be able to support any foreseeable future [compliant] card, > > you've really got no choice but to implement a full CF interface. > > > > -- Lewin A.R.W. Edwards (http://www.zws.com/) > > Learn how to develop high-end embedded systems on a tight budget! > > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0750676094/zws-20 > > According to my information ext. bus devices are due in Q1/04 with the > same functionality as the 64-pin devices that were just announced. The > external external bus is supposed to be the only difference (heard > that in a training provided by Philips). May be it would be a good > idea to use those devices. > Also pricing is very similar to the devices without bus. Philips is a > litte late to join the race in the ARM market but heck they seem to be > very serious! In one way they were first! VLSI made the original ARM chips for Acorn and was subsequently taken over by Philips. Leon
Message
Re: CF Interface Mode Ext. Bus version
2003-12-20 by leon_heller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.