As a wishy washy vendor that tries to make everyone happy, we will release the parallel version first because of the lower cost and then probably the USB for convenience later on :-) At 06:37 AM 12/11/2004, you wrote: >As a potential customer I would much rather parallel, because it's >easier to support in Linux than some weird-ass proprietary undocumented >USB device. > >On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 09:34, Joe Hlebasko wrote: > > As a potential customer, I would prefer to go USB. It's not really a speed > > issue but a convienance issue. Most PC these days have USB ports out front, > > etc. // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)
Message
RE: [lpc2000] RE: Re: Unable to flash to extenal memory
2004-12-12 by Richard