It is pulled high, but the issue I am having is the memory locations themselves. --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Charles R. Grenz" <charles.grenz@s...> wrote: > Hi, > > Do you have the slave select pin pull high? > > > Charles > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: tah2k [mailto:tah2k@y...] > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 9:59 AM > To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [lpc2000] Re: LPC2138: Strange SSP Behavior > > > > > Yes, but it doesn't seem to matter. > > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "johnnorgaard2003" <john_2005@c...> > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Have you selected the SSP function in PINSEL0 or PINSEL1 ? > > > > > > best regards > > > > John > > > > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "tah2k" <tah2k@y...> wrote: > > > > > > I'm writing the driver for the LPC2138 SSP block and I am > > > encountering some strange behavior: > > > > > > First of all, the user manual states SSPCR1, SSPCPSR, and > SSPIMSC > > > are all reset to 0x0 upon powerup. > > > > > > I am finding the following values in these registers after reset: > > > SSPCR1 (0xE005C004): 0xF8 SSPCPSR (0xE005C010): 0x04 > > > SSPIMSC (0xE005C014): 0x04 > > > > > > The processor ignores any writes of any data value to these > > > locations. > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > -Tim > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
Re: LPC2138: Strange SSP Behavior
2005-01-11 by tah2k
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.