Lpc2000

Ok. so you're saying that having 3.3V first, than 1.8V works fine now? That
is you did not change anything from the first prototype to second to fix the
JTAG inconsistencies?

Thanks for the info!

Cheers,

m.

 

  _____  

From: Owen Mooney [mailto:ojm@...] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 5:14 PM
To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [lpc2000] Question: Secondary JTAG internals

 

I am using the secondary JTAG on the LPC2106 - its fine. I have done it with
a modified Olimex P1 board and my own board

They both use different brands of regulator with no start up sequencing, and
a simple RC reset circuit.

Having said that, the secondary JTAG on the first of my boards (3 V up then
1.8 up) spat the dummy and worked intermittanly, then refused to work
properly. I built another prototype and that works perfectly.

Not an answer for you - but more information to the digest. 

Hi,

I was wondering if anyone has any information regarding the secondary JTAG -
internal structure. I'm battling a problem that I can only connect to JTAG
after I've SHORTed the 3.3 V line. My powerup sequence is - first core
(1.8v) and then IOs (3.3v) (btw there is nothing in the datasheet that
mentions the sequence, so I presumed it wouldn't matter). Without shorting
the tool will refuse to connect, but once shorted - works like a charm. 

I'm trying to understand the problem behind this. What I'm not sure how is
this presumably muliplexor setup by the core, and how does it stay set after
the core resets. Anyway, I'm out of ideas at this point, but this simple yet
annoying problem is bugging the hell out of me.

Thanks for any insight!

Cheer,

m.  




  _____  

Yahoo! Groups Links

*	To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/
  
*	To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> 
  
*	Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]